书籍详情
法理学：法律哲学 英文本
作者：（美）瑟亚·P.辛哈（Surya Prakash Sinha）著
出版社：法律出版社
出版时间：2004-01-01
ISBN：9787503645679
定价：¥28.00
购买这本书可以去
内容简介
在英美法学中，法理学与法律哲学意旨相同，均是就法律现象的基本问题提出疑问并试图加以解答的理论努力。法理学根源于人类生活对秩序的基本需求，滥觞于人类对正义问题的哲学探索。概因人们文化传统、经济条件、政治地位、社会心理等诸多因素的各不相同，对正义和秩序等问题的认识也就千差万别，甚至大相径庭。伴随着认识的差别，各类法理学的观点、理论和著述也便应运而生。法理学之与法律学习和法学研究，恰如地基之与大厦、灵魂之与身体，重要性自不待言。它可以使我们摆脱关于法律现象的种种偏见，包括由常识、时代和民族的习见以及主观上未经深思熟虑而滋长的自信所形成的偏见。它还可以使我们避免部门法人为划分的狭隘限制，继而形成对法律世界的全面关照，为思想和行动开启广阔的空间。当代中国，经济、社会和文化都处在急剧变化的历史时期，法律结构也面临巨大的调整。如何在国内外纷繁复杂的条件下，重新调整中国的法律、社会结构，成为当下中国律和法学界的首要问题。他山之石，可以攻玉。全面充分地了解外国的、特别是西方国家的法律思想无疑是我们做出正确选择的一个必要条件。呈现在读者诸君面前的，是一本内容全面、深入浅出、在英语世界极受欢迎的法理学入门读物。全书内容分为三大部分：第一部分，形而上学认识论中的法律理论。介绍和评论宗教和神启的法律理论、自然法理论。第二部分，唯心主义认识论中的法律理论。介绍和评论康德、黑格尔、施塔姆勒、威奇奥的法律思想。第三部分，经验主义认识论中的法律理论。介绍和评论实证主义法律理论、历史主义法律理论、社会学法律理论、心理学法律理论、美国现实主义法律理论、斯堪的纳维亚现实主义法律理论、现象学法律理论和批判法学运动。本书第十四章表现作者的基本观点，并且曾掀起过—场称之为“法律多中心性”的新法理学运动。
作者简介
瑟亚·P·辛哈，美国当代法理学家，美国派斯大学法学院荣誉退休教授，哥伦比亚大学和平问题思想库重要成员，著述颇丰，广泛涉及法理学、国际法、侵权法、比较法、法律经济学和法律教育等领域。其著作在当今世界享有较高声誉并且被国际法院在正式文件中引用。
目录
OUTLINE
Chapter1.Introduction
Chapter2.PreparationfortheStudyofTheoriesofLaw
A.Non-universalityofLaw
1.TheWesternCivilization
2.TheChineseCivilization
3.TheIndianCivilization
4.TheJapaneseCivilization
5.TheAfricanCivilizations
B.IrreconcilableEpistemologiesinTheoriesAboutLaw
C.IdeologicalIncipienceinTheoriesofLaw
PARTI.THEORIESOFLAWINMETAPHYSICAL-RATIONAL
EPISTEMOLOGY
Chapter3.DivineandPropheticTheoriesofLaw
Theories
Criticisms
Chapter4.NaturalLawTheories
A.EarlyTheoriesofNaturalLaw
Theories
A.EarlyTheoriesofNaturalLawContinued
1.NaturalLawasLawofVirtue
A.Dharma(India,VedicPeriod:1500 B. C.500 B. C.)
B.Lao-Tsze(China, B.604 B. C.)
C.Confucius(China,550or551 B. C.478 B. C.)
2.NaturalLawasJusticebyNature
3.NaturalLawasLawofRightReason
4.NaturalLawasLawofGod
Criticisms
B.ModernTheoriesofNaturalLaw
Theories
1.NaturalLawasObjectivelyGivenValue:Francois
Gény(1861－1944)
2.NaturalLawasMorals:JeanDabin( B.1889)
3.NaturalLawasDeontology: A.ED’Entreves
(1902－1985)
4.NaturalLawasRelatedtoSociology:PhilipSelznick
( B.1919)
5.NaturalLawasBasedonAnthropology:MargaretMead
(19011978);and
MayEdel(19091964)andAbrahamEdel( B.1908)
6.NaturalLawasEthicalJurisprudence:MorrisRaphael
Cohen(1880－1947)
B.ModernTheoriesofNaturalLaw-Continued
7.NaturalLawastheInnerMoralityofLaw:LonL.
Fuller(1902－1978)
Criticisms
PARTII.THEORIESOFLAWINIDEALISTEPISTEMOLOGY
Chapter5.IdealistTheoriesofLaw
Theories
1.LawasHarmonizingVoluntaryActions:ImmanuelKant
(1724－1804)
2.LawastheIdeaofFreedom:GeorgWilhelmFriedrich
Hegel(1770-1831)
3.LawastheAdjustmentofPurposes:RudolphStammler
(1856-1938)
4.LawasthePrincipleofLegalEvolution:GeorgioDel
Vecchio(1878-1970)
Criticisms
1.Kant
2.Hegel
3.Stammler
4.DelVecchio
PARTⅢ.THEORIESOFLAWINEMPIRICISTEPISTEMOLOGY
Chapter6.PositivistTheoriesofLaw
A.EarlyPositivistTheoriesofLaw
Theories
1.Kautilya(India,FourthCentury B. C.)
2.Shanglang(China,?-338 B. C.)
3.ShuenTao(China,ContemporaryofShanglang)
4.HanFeiTzu(China280?-233 B. C.)Criticisms
B.LaterPositivistTheoriesofLaw
Theories
1.TheCommandTheoryofLawofthe Utilitarians:
Jeremy
Bentham(1748－1832),JohnStuartMill(1806－1873),
JohnAustin(1790-1859)
2.TheNormativeTheoryofLaw:HansKelson(1881－1973)
3.TheRuleTheoryofLaw:H.L. A.Hart( B.1907)
Criticisms
1.Bentham
2.Austin
3.Kelsen
B.LaterPositivistTheoriesofLaw-Continued
4.Hart
Chapter7.HistoricalTheoriesofLaw
Theories
1.LawasaManifestationoftheSpiritofthePeople
inHistory:
FriedrichKarlvonSavigny(1719-1861)
2.LawastheDevelopmentinHistoryofPersonal
ConditionsFrom
StatustoContract:SirHenrySumnerMaine
(1822-1888)
3.LawasanAuxiliaryinaStageofEconomic
Determinism:Karl
Marx(1818-1883)andFriedrichEngels(1820-1895)
Criticisms
1.Savigny
2.Maine
3.MarxandEngels
Chapter8.SociologicalTheoriesofLaw
Theories
A.LawinSociologicalAspects
1.LawintheSocialPurpose:RudolfvonIhering
(1818-1892)
2.LawintheInnerOrderofHumanAssociations:Eugen
Ehrlich(1862-1922)
A.LawinSociologicalAspects-Continued
3.LawintheObjectiveConditionsofSocial
Solidarity:LeonDuguit(1859-1928)
B.JurisprudenceofInterests:PhilipHeck(18581943)and
RoscoePound(1870-1964)
C.FreeLaw:EugenEhrlich(18621922)andHermannU.
Kantorowicz(18771940)
Criticisms
1.Ihering
2.Ehrlich
3.Duguit
4.JurisprudenceofInterests
5.FreeLaw
Chapter9.PsychologicalTheoryofLaw
Theory
Criticisms
Chapter10.AmericanRealistTheoriesTheories
A.PhilosophicalFrameworkofAmericanRealism:John
Dewey(1859－1952)and
WilliamJames(1842-1910)
B.ExpressionsofAmericanRealism
1.LawasRulesofConductLaidDownbyJudges:John
ChipmanGray(1839-1915)
B.ExpressionsofAmericanRealism-Continued
2.LawasProphecyofWhattheCourts
WillDo:OliverWendellHolmes,Jr.(1841-1935)
3.LawasWhatCertainOfficialsDoAboutDisputes;
Karl
N.Llewellyn(1893－1962)
4.LawasGeneralizationofPotentialLegalEffectand
ConsiderationsWeighedbyCourtsintheDecisionof
Cases:JosephW.Bingham( B.1878)
5.LawFromaPsychoanalyticalPointofView:Jerome
Frank(1889-1957)
Criticisms
Chapter1 1.ScandinavianRealistTheoriesofLaw
Theories
1.LawasConativeImpulse:AxelHagerstrom(1869-1939)
2.LawasIndependentImperatives:KarlOlivecrona( B.
1897)
3.LawDeterminedbySocialWelfare:VilhelmLundstedt
(1882-1955)
4.LawasaSchemeofInterpretationforaSetof
SocialFacts
ThatConstitutetheCounterpartofLegalNorms:Alf
Ross( B.1899)
Criticisms
Chapter12.PhenomenologicalTheoriesofLaw
Theories
1.NatureofThingApproach
2.ValuePhilosophyApproach
3.PositivistandExistentialistApproaches
Criticisms
Chapter13.TheCriticalLegalStudiesMovementandIts
Offshoots
A.CriticalLegalStudies
PhilosophicalMoorings
Criticisms
B.FeministJurisprudence
1.CommonThemes
2.VariousSchools
3.Methodology
C.CriticalRaceTheory
Chapter14.LegalPolycentricity
Chapter16.Conclusion:OnDefiningLaw
INDEX
Chapter1.Introduction
Chapter2.PreparationfortheStudyofTheoriesofLaw
A.Non-universalityofLaw
1.TheWesternCivilization
2.TheChineseCivilization
3.TheIndianCivilization
4.TheJapaneseCivilization
5.TheAfricanCivilizations
B.IrreconcilableEpistemologiesinTheoriesAboutLaw
C.IdeologicalIncipienceinTheoriesofLaw
PARTI.THEORIESOFLAWINMETAPHYSICAL-RATIONAL
EPISTEMOLOGY
Chapter3.DivineandPropheticTheoriesofLaw
Theories
Criticisms
Chapter4.NaturalLawTheories
A.EarlyTheoriesofNaturalLaw
Theories
A.EarlyTheoriesofNaturalLawContinued
1.NaturalLawasLawofVirtue
A.Dharma(India,VedicPeriod:1500 B. C.500 B. C.)
B.Lao-Tsze(China, B.604 B. C.)
C.Confucius(China,550or551 B. C.478 B. C.)
2.NaturalLawasJusticebyNature
3.NaturalLawasLawofRightReason
4.NaturalLawasLawofGod
Criticisms
B.ModernTheoriesofNaturalLaw
Theories
1.NaturalLawasObjectivelyGivenValue:Francois
Gény(1861－1944)
2.NaturalLawasMorals:JeanDabin( B.1889)
3.NaturalLawasDeontology: A.ED’Entreves
(1902－1985)
4.NaturalLawasRelatedtoSociology:PhilipSelznick
( B.1919)
5.NaturalLawasBasedonAnthropology:MargaretMead
(19011978);and
MayEdel(19091964)andAbrahamEdel( B.1908)
6.NaturalLawasEthicalJurisprudence:MorrisRaphael
Cohen(1880－1947)
B.ModernTheoriesofNaturalLaw-Continued
7.NaturalLawastheInnerMoralityofLaw:LonL.
Fuller(1902－1978)
Criticisms
PARTII.THEORIESOFLAWINIDEALISTEPISTEMOLOGY
Chapter5.IdealistTheoriesofLaw
Theories
1.LawasHarmonizingVoluntaryActions:ImmanuelKant
(1724－1804)
2.LawastheIdeaofFreedom:GeorgWilhelmFriedrich
Hegel(1770-1831)
3.LawastheAdjustmentofPurposes:RudolphStammler
(1856-1938)
4.LawasthePrincipleofLegalEvolution:GeorgioDel
Vecchio(1878-1970)
Criticisms
1.Kant
2.Hegel
3.Stammler
4.DelVecchio
PARTⅢ.THEORIESOFLAWINEMPIRICISTEPISTEMOLOGY
Chapter6.PositivistTheoriesofLaw
A.EarlyPositivistTheoriesofLaw
Theories
1.Kautilya(India,FourthCentury B. C.)
2.Shanglang(China,?-338 B. C.)
3.ShuenTao(China,ContemporaryofShanglang)
4.HanFeiTzu(China280?-233 B. C.)Criticisms
B.LaterPositivistTheoriesofLaw
Theories
1.TheCommandTheoryofLawofthe Utilitarians:
Jeremy
Bentham(1748－1832),JohnStuartMill(1806－1873),
JohnAustin(1790-1859)
2.TheNormativeTheoryofLaw:HansKelson(1881－1973)
3.TheRuleTheoryofLaw:H.L. A.Hart( B.1907)
Criticisms
1.Bentham
2.Austin
3.Kelsen
B.LaterPositivistTheoriesofLaw-Continued
4.Hart
Chapter7.HistoricalTheoriesofLaw
Theories
1.LawasaManifestationoftheSpiritofthePeople
inHistory:
FriedrichKarlvonSavigny(1719-1861)
2.LawastheDevelopmentinHistoryofPersonal
ConditionsFrom
StatustoContract:SirHenrySumnerMaine
(1822-1888)
3.LawasanAuxiliaryinaStageofEconomic
Determinism:Karl
Marx(1818-1883)andFriedrichEngels(1820-1895)
Criticisms
1.Savigny
2.Maine
3.MarxandEngels
Chapter8.SociologicalTheoriesofLaw
Theories
A.LawinSociologicalAspects
1.LawintheSocialPurpose:RudolfvonIhering
(1818-1892)
2.LawintheInnerOrderofHumanAssociations:Eugen
Ehrlich(1862-1922)
A.LawinSociologicalAspects-Continued
3.LawintheObjectiveConditionsofSocial
Solidarity:LeonDuguit(1859-1928)
B.JurisprudenceofInterests:PhilipHeck(18581943)and
RoscoePound(1870-1964)
C.FreeLaw:EugenEhrlich(18621922)andHermannU.
Kantorowicz(18771940)
Criticisms
1.Ihering
2.Ehrlich
3.Duguit
4.JurisprudenceofInterests
5.FreeLaw
Chapter9.PsychologicalTheoryofLaw
Theory
Criticisms
Chapter10.AmericanRealistTheoriesTheories
A.PhilosophicalFrameworkofAmericanRealism:John
Dewey(1859－1952)and
WilliamJames(1842-1910)
B.ExpressionsofAmericanRealism
1.LawasRulesofConductLaidDownbyJudges:John
ChipmanGray(1839-1915)
B.ExpressionsofAmericanRealism-Continued
2.LawasProphecyofWhattheCourts
WillDo:OliverWendellHolmes,Jr.(1841-1935)
3.LawasWhatCertainOfficialsDoAboutDisputes;
Karl
N.Llewellyn(1893－1962)
4.LawasGeneralizationofPotentialLegalEffectand
ConsiderationsWeighedbyCourtsintheDecisionof
Cases:JosephW.Bingham( B.1878)
5.LawFromaPsychoanalyticalPointofView:Jerome
Frank(1889-1957)
Criticisms
Chapter1 1.ScandinavianRealistTheoriesofLaw
Theories
1.LawasConativeImpulse:AxelHagerstrom(1869-1939)
2.LawasIndependentImperatives:KarlOlivecrona( B.
1897)
3.LawDeterminedbySocialWelfare:VilhelmLundstedt
(1882-1955)
4.LawasaSchemeofInterpretationforaSetof
SocialFacts
ThatConstitutetheCounterpartofLegalNorms:Alf
Ross( B.1899)
Criticisms
Chapter12.PhenomenologicalTheoriesofLaw
Theories
1.NatureofThingApproach
2.ValuePhilosophyApproach
3.PositivistandExistentialistApproaches
Criticisms
Chapter13.TheCriticalLegalStudiesMovementandIts
Offshoots
A.CriticalLegalStudies
PhilosophicalMoorings
Criticisms
B.FeministJurisprudence
1.CommonThemes
2.VariousSchools
3.Methodology
C.CriticalRaceTheory
Chapter14.LegalPolycentricity
Chapter16.Conclusion:OnDefiningLaw
INDEX
猜您喜欢
